Kasama

An age of information, but rarely of ideas. Let's change that.




  • Subscribe

  • Categories

  • Comments

    carldavidson on Forget Bob Dylan, remember Bob…
    ron jacobs on Forget Bob Dylan, remember Bob…
    Tunisie travail on fascism: flag and cross
    ish on Urgent… today…. NO…
    Kumar Sarkar, Second… on Urgent… today…. NO…
    carldavidson on Roberto’s question: So w…
    Mike E on Urgent… today…. NO…
    Geoff Schotter on Urgent… today…. NO…
    louisproyect on Urgent… today…. NO…
    Chris on Roberto’s question: So w…
    Keith on Roberto’s question: So w…
    Mike E on Roberto’s question: So w…
    maju00 on Roberto’s question: So w…
    Chris on Roberto’s question: So w…
    maju00 on Roberto’s question: So w…
  • Archives

lessons of cointelpro

Posted by Mike E on December 1, 2007

cointelpro jacking up antagonism among progressive and revolutionary forcesA sister in the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade passed on a new link about cointelpro from Z-net. (“The House of Reps Vote 404 to 6 to Pass the Bill that Legalizes COINTELPRO?” by Justin Ponkow and Troy Nkrumah)

For many reasons, the lessons of cointelpro in the 60s and the dangers of cointelpro now are worth thinking through.

Historically the political police (FBI) tried to spark violent conflict between revolutionary groups. People often had real and principled differences of politics and ideology. But the police tried to get groups to view those expressing such differences as as enemies and police agents. Police infiltrators in various political groups would accuse other political trends of being “police agents” or “enemies.” They would hype a sense of possible attack and mutual antagonism. They would invent statements and charges — and circulate them. Some times honest revolutionaries would get caught up in the “badjacketing” of false accusations true (sometimes even on their own) spreading or believing false charges against other activists.

We need a revolutionary atmosphere where “a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought content.” We need a revolutionary movement where people can express sharp and principled mutual criticism — where we struggle over truth and line from the high plane. where we all are conscious enough not to see such criticism or the people raising such criticism as “enemies.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 220 other followers