Kasama

An age of information, but rarely of ideas. Let's change that.




  • Subscribe

  • Categories

  • Comments

    maju00 on Strategy: How do we get free f…
    cbmilne33 on Condescending saviours: What w…
    Broad Slogan on Strategy: How do we get free f…
    future's ours on Condescending saviours: What w…
    Joseph Ball on Condescending saviours: What w…
    Otto on Condescending saviours: What w…
    old commie on Strategy: How do we get free f…
    partisaani on ANTARSYA: Another radical view…
    Scardanelli on Roberto’s question: So w…
    Mike E on Roberto’s question: So w…
    PatrickSMcNally on Roberto’s question: So w…
    Carl Davidson on Roberto’s question: So w…
    giovanni33 on Roberto’s question: So w…
    jim sharp on Badiou: The racism of int…
    trotskyite on Strategy: How do we get free f…
  • Archives

Archive for the ‘Darwin Day’ Category

Revolutionary Ideas: On Marx and Darwin

Posted by Mike E on February 15, 2009

darwin_dayThanks to the Danish site Modkraft (counter-force).

Natural History 
Stephen Jay Gould: A Darwinian gentleman at Marx’s funeral (Sept, 1999)
“The odd friendship of an evolutionist and a revolutionist.” Reprinted as chapter six in Stephen Jay Gould: I Have Landed (London, 2002).

Anton Pannekoek
 Marx and Darwin (1912)

The Friends of Charles Darwin
 Marx of Respect (2006)
“It’s a well-known chestnut of Darwinian trivia that the father of international socialism, Karl Marx, once offered to dedicate one of the volumes of his magnum opus, Das Kapital, to that other 19th Century bearded revolutionary living in the south of England, Charles Darwin. Unfortunately, it turns out that this particular chestnut is something of a myth, although the story of how it came about is of interest in its own right.”

Marxists Internet Archive
Glossary of People: Darwin, Charles (1890-82)

Monthly Review 
Margaret A. Fay: Marx and Darwin: A literary detective story (Vol. 31, No. 10, March 1980, p. 40-57)

“… Marx’s offer to dedicate any of his work to Darwin was finally revealed for what it really is: a myth which entered the accumulation of historical facts when a letter which Darwin had written to Aveling in 1880 was attributed to Marx’s correspondence 50 years after both Marx and Darwin died.”

New Left Review 
Valentino Gerratana: Marx and Darwin (Issue 82, Nov.-Dec. 1973, p.60-82)

“… a striking and sensitive analysis of the actual relations between Marx and Darwin, which should put to rest many partisan preconceptions.” Only summary online.

History of Political Thought 
D.A. Stack: The first Darwinian left : radical and socialist responces to Darwin, 1859-1914 (pdf) (Vol. 21, No. 4, Winter 2000, 29 p.)

“Myths, misunderstanding and neglect have combined to obscure our understanding of the relationship between left-wing politics and Darwinian science. This article seeks to redress the balance by studying how radical and socialist thinkers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, desperate to legitimate their work with scientific authority, wrestled with the paradoxical challenges Darwinism posed for their politics.”

See also book review: Evolution and Revolution (Socialist Review, November 2003)

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Charles Darwin, Darwin Day | 10 Comments »

What’s in a Name: Honor Charles Darwin, But Kiss Off Darwinism?

Posted by Mike E on February 10, 2009

Charles Darwin

Charles Darwin

We approach Darwin Day,  a well-deserved celebration of Charles Darwin’s 200th birthday. People around the world honor his life, his great idea of natural selection and enthusiastically popularize  evolutionary biology (against religious myth). 

The following piece asks what is the impact of  so often referring to a science using the name of one man (a “founding father” of sorts).

How accurate is that? How well does it capture the relationship between the founding and development of scientific insights?

As always, posting  this article here (borrowed from the New York Times Feb. 10) is not an endorsement of its analysis. (Its own reference to Marxism is particularly, uh, uniformed.)  But it is helpful raise questions about how to view, describe and develop living science — and how to understand  and describe the role of pathbreaking individuals within the greater collective work.

What should we name that presumptuous communist theoretical work of “knowing the world to change it”?

* * * * * *    

Darwinism Must Die So That Evolution May Live

By CARL SAFINA

“You care for nothing but shooting, dogs and rat-catching,” Robert Darwin told his son, “and you will be a disgrace to yourself and all your family.” Yet the feckless boy is everywhere. Charles Darwin gets so much credit, we can’t distinguish evolution from him.

Equating evolution with Charles Darwin ignores 150 years of discoveries, including most of what scientists understand about evolution. Such as: Gregor Mendel’s patterns of heredity (which gave Darwin’s idea of natural selection a mechanism — genetics — by which it could work); the discovery of DNA (which gave genetics a mechanism and lets us see evolutionary lineages); developmental biology (which gives DNA a mechanism); studies documenting evolution in nature (which converted the hypothetical to observable fact); evolution’s role in medicine and disease (bringing immediate relevance to the topic); and more.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Charles Darwin, Darwin Day, evolution, fundamentalism | 25 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 220 other followers