Double-think on 9/11 casualties: Justified response? Or calculated aggression?

The following appeared thanks to RT. This and related graphics are available with discussion of methodology.

Dig in.

0 Character restriction
Your text should be more than 10 characters

People in this conversation

  • Guest (feudeprairie)

    Great and terrible... I was looking for this kind of picture. I translated it into french: http://feudeprairie.wordpress.com/2011/09/11/les-faits-sont-tetus/

  • Guest (Mike E)

    Thanks FdP. We posted that french version on this page, underneath the english one.

  • Guest (Brian Gallagher)

    comment on the graph by Richard Seymour, Lenin's Tomb blog:
    <blockquote>we have absolutely *no* reliable sources on Afghanistan. There's simply nothing comparable to the Lancet study. An epidemiological survey of the first 9 months of the Afghanistan war estimated about 10,000 excess deaths. According to Jonathan Steele, some estimates put total deaths as high as 50,000 in the first year alone. The idea that Afghan mortality now stands at below 40,000 is a joke - that country has been bombed even more intensively than Iraq.</blockquote>

    So the Red and Gray slivers should be smaller and the Blue (afghan) sliver is likely quote larger.