Indian Gov't Bans Maoist Communist Party

This article was posted on the BBC. Thanks to Ka Frank for pointing it out.

India bans Maoist communist party The Indian government has banned the Maoist Communist Party of India as a terrorist group, giving security forces enhanced powers of arrest.

The move provides Indian police with the power to detain members of the party even if they have not been involved in insurgent activity.

Earlier, five states across east and central India were put on a high alert as the Maoists called a two-day strike.

One district in West Bengal briefly fell under almost total Maoist control.

The rebels said the strike they declared was in response to the "war" on people in Lalgarh, West Bengal, where security forces launched an offensive in recent days.

Lalgarh had been under the virtual control of the rebels since November.

But police and paramilitary troops have been attempting to consolidate their grip on the jungle enclave over which they re-established control over the weekend.

Monday's strike began a day after 11 police officers died in a rebel attack in Chhattisgarh state and two days after 16 policemen were killed in landmine blasts triggered by the Maoists in the same state.

Issuing a high alert for the five states in which the strike was declared, the interior ministry said India's federal Intelligence Bureau had "specific inputs" that Maoists were planning possible attacks.

"Security forces, as well as economic infrastructure like railways, buses and crowded markets, may be targeted by the Maoists to make their presence felt during the strike," the interior ministry advisory said.

India's prime minister, Manmohan Singh, has described the Maoists as the greatest threat to India's internal security.

The ban on the Communist Party of India (Maoist) comes just a month after the Congress party won a decisive victory in elections - leaving it with no need to turn to communist parties for support in shoring up a coalition.

Correspondents say it is unclear how big an impact the ban will have in the fight against the rebels.

Lalgarh unrest

Villagers in Lalgarh say their young men are being forced by police to hunt for explosives planted by the Maoists.

Bengali artists meeting villagers in Lalgarh Artists are trying to broker peace between rebels and the government

"They are giving the village boys an S-shaped iron rod each, asking them to hook it to wires sticking out anywhere and pull it. This is dangerous because they will be too close to the explosives if the wires are linked to them," said Chattradhar Mahato, chairman of the Peoples Committee on Police Atrocities (PCPA), active in the Lalgarh area.

Some of Bengal's leading artists, including film-maker Aparna Sen, visited Lalgarh on Sunday in a attempt to broker peace between the West Bengal government and the Maoists.

But neither appeared to be in a mood to talk.

"The Maoists have no specific demand, they are just out to create trouble. We have to continue the operations to deal with them," said Bengal's chief secretary Ashok Mohan Chakrabarty.

Maoist leader Kishneji told the BBC: "We will show the government what is people's power. No police or army can crush that."

Thousands of villagers have fled their homes in the Lalgarh region to avoid getting caught in the fighting, heading towards neighbouring areas of Bankura district.

The Bengal government started the offensive to retake Lalgarh, which had effectively been under Maoist control since November.

The Maoists skilfully harnessed people's anger over police excesses following an Maoist attempt to kill chief minister Buddha Bhattacharya through a landmine blast, says the BBC's Subir Bhaumik in Calcutta.

Maoist-linked violence has killed 6,000 people in India over two decades.

Dig in.

0 Character restriction
Your text should be more than 10 characters

People in this conversation

  • Guest (redgrape)

    I wrote a bit about this myself on my new blog: http://redgrape.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/revolutionary-forces-defeated-in-west-bengal/

    It is somewhat ironic, somewhat tragic, somewhat comical that the political forces who actually dominate politics in West Bengal are none other than the Communist Party of India (Marxist), and that it is they who approached the state government for help in quelling the Maoist movement in their state. If anything is more showing of a "communist's" revolutionary illegitimacy it is when they use the tools of oppression of the bourgeos state itself to crush a revolutionary movement. Worse still, many contemporary communist organizations in the west (you know the type -- the reformist parliamentarists) hold this same view of various Maoist movements.

    But while the defeat in Lalgarh is a setback it is by no means the war's end. Infact, the very existence of such an enormous undertaking by the CPI(Maoist) is cause for celebration; never before have they attempted and succeeded in such a show of revolutionary capability and strength. I have noticed the past several years the Naxalites have been growing in influence and strength, carrying out broader initiatives against corrupt land owners and bourgeois politicians throughout India's rural exterior, forming closer and closer ties with the peasant population. We should all mourn the defeat in Lalgarh, but we should also celebrate such a potential step.

  • We should follow these events, and report on what happens, and raise awareness in North america that these very revolutionary movements of the people exist. It seems a bit early to start talking about a Maoist "defeat in Lalgarh" or a "setback" and "mourning" and so on -- as Red Grape seems to be doing.

    I agree with Redgrape that these events expose the nature of the CPI(Marxist).

    However this is really not a new story or new exposure. This party were instrumental in the bloody suppression of the original Naxalite uprising in 1968 (i.e. forty years ago!)-- and have been in the forefront of counterrevolutionary activities ever since.

  • Guest (redgrape)

    I've always been a bit of a pessimist (I prefer "realist", heh); perhaps I was too quick to judge the struggle in Lalgarh as a defeat. Actually, after perusing over the latest reports coming from India it seems I was. There have been several high-profile incidents throughout the country, including in Bihar where Maoist cadres freed four captured comrades from a courthouse, including a commander.

  • Guest (Friend of a Friend)

    Partisans of the CPI(Marxist) have been doing propaganda work against the Naxals, accusing them of things like "provoking police" to kill them(!?), so as to make the reactionary fake communists look bad for elections. Only in their own entitled minds! Really gross stuff. Not a communist party. Not Marxist at all.

    Look out, because these professional, bourgeois (and pro-neoliberal economics) CPI(Marxist) are a totally reactionary party. They work with Tata and other big capitalists and are butchers of the honest popular movements. They are political hacks and are losing now in elections while many of the people they used to take for granted are now organizing as Maoist.

    The CPI Maoist must figure out how to make inroads among the urban classes.

  • Guest (David_D)

    I wouldn't characterize this as a defeat at all. The CPI(Maoist) didn't start the movement raging in Lalgarh, nor did it start the People's Committee Against Police Atrocities. But it did step forward and provide leadership to the masses who were clamoring for protection from the forces of reaction. That is the duty of a communist party, even when the time is not ripe for the seizure of power, or the masses aren't following the best strategy and tactics.

    The concept of "liberated zone" is problematic, obviously. The state would certainly be able to move in reclaim the area. The Maoists certainly were aware of this.

    So few Maoists have been killed or captured. Why? Because they were prepared, and melted away into the masses. who supported them completely.

    Now, with the CPI(Marxist) completely exposed throughout West Bengal, and the Maoists standing tall as selfless defenders of the people's interests, a strategic victory has been won, regardless of the military situation with the several dozen villages in question. The seeds of revolution are being sown throughout the state, and many will step forward to strengthen the ranks of the party and people's army.